The Yoga Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki ( Introduction) -2

0 comments




























The
Yoga Vasishtha
Maharamayana
of Valmiki

The only complete English translation is
by Vihari Lala  Mitra (1891).







THE YOGA PHILOSOPHY.

The Yoga or contemplative philosophy of the Hindus, is rich, exuberant,
grand and sublime, in as much as it comprehends within its ample sphere
and deep recesses of meditation, all that is of the greatest value, best
interest and highest importance to mankind, as physical, moral,
intellectual and spiritual beings—a knowledge of the cosmos—of the
physical and intellectual worlds.
It is rich in the almost exhaustless treasure of works existing on the
subject in the sacred and vernacular languages of the country both of
ancient and modern times. It is exuberant in the profusion of erudition
and prolixity of ingenuity displayed in the Yoga philosophy of
Patanjali, commensurate with the extraordinary calibre of the author in
his commentary of the Mahábháshya on Pánini (Müller's A. S. Lit. p.
235). Its grandeur is exhibited in the abstract and abstruse reflections
and investigations of philosophers in the intellectual and spiritual
worlds as far as human penetration has been able to reach. And its
sublimity is manifested in its aspiring disquisition into the nature of
the human and divine souls, which it aims to unite with the one
self-same and all pervading spirit.
It has employed the minds of gods, sages, and saints, and even those of
heroes and monarchs, to the exaltation of their natures above the rest
of mankind, and elevation of their dignities to the rank of gods, as
nothing less than a godly nature can approach and approximate that of
the All-perfect Divinity. So says Plato in his Phaedras: "To contemplate
these things is the privilege of the gods, and to do so is also the
aspiration of the immortal soul of man generally; though only in a few
cases is such aspiration realized."
The principal gods Brahmá and Siva are represented as Yogis, the chief
sages Vyása, Válmiki, Vasishtha and Yájnavalkya were propounders of
Yoga systems; the saints one and all were adepts in Yoga; the heroes
Ráma and Krishna were initiated in it, and the kings Dasaratha and
Janaka and their fellow prince Buddha were both practitioners and
preceptors of Yoga. Mohammed held his nightly communions with God and
his angels, and Jesus often went over the hills—there to pray and
contemplate. Socrates had his demon to communicate with, and in fact
every man has his genius with whom he communes on all matters. All this
is Yoga, and so is all knowledge derived by intuition, inspiration and
revelation, said to be the result of Yoga.
II. Sciences Connected with Yoga
The yoga philosophy, while it treats of a variety of subjects, is
necessarily a congeries of many sciences in itself. It is the Hindu form
of metaphysical argument for the existence of the 'One Eternal'—the
Platonic "Reality." It is ontology in as much as it teaches a priori
the being of God. It is psychology in its treatment of the doctrine of
feelings and passions, and it is morality in teaching us to keep them
under control as brutal propensities, for the sake of securing our final
emancipation and ultimate restoration into the spirit of spirits. Thus
it partakes of the nature of many sciences in treating of the particular
subject of divinity.
The Yoga in its widest sense of the application of the mind to any
subject is both practical, called kriyá Yoga, as also theoretical,
known as Jnána Yoga; and includes in itself the two processes of
synthesis and analysis alike, in its combination (Yoga) of things
together, and discrimination (Viveka) of one from the other, in its
inquiry into the nature of things (Vastuvichára), and investigation of
their abstract essence called Satyánusandhánná. It uses both the a
priori (púrvavat) and a posteriori (paravat) arguments to prove
the existence of the world from its Maker and the vice versa, as
indicated in the two aphorisms of induction and deduction Yatová imani
and Janmadyasya yatah &c. It views both subjectively and objectively
the one self in many and the many in one unto which all is to return,
by the two mysterious formulas of So ham and tat twam &c.
It is the reunion of detached souls with the Supreme that is the chief
object of the Yoga philosophy to effect by the aforesaid processes and
other means, which we propose fully to elucidate in the following pages;
and there is no soul we think so very reprobate, that will feel
disinclined to take a deep interest in them, in order to effect its
reunion with the main source of its being and the only fountain of all
blessings. On the contrary we are led to believe from the revival of the
yoga-cult with the spiritualists and theosophists of the present day
under the teachings of Madame Blavatsky and the lectures of Col. Olcott,
that the Indian public are beginning to appreciate the efficacy of Yoga
meditation, and its practice gaining ground among the pious and educated
men in this country.
Notwithstanding the various significations of Yoga and the different
lights in which it is viewed by several schools, as we shall see
afterwards, it is most commonly understood in the sense of the esoteric
faith of the Hindus, and the occult adoration of God by spiritual
meditation. This is considered on all hands as the only means of one's
ultimate liberation from the general doom of birth and death and the
miseries of this world, and the surest way towards the final absorption
of one's-self in the Supreme,—the highest state of perfection and the
Summum bonum of the Hindu. The subject of Yoga Vasishtha is no other
than the effecting of that union of the human with the Divine Soul,
amidst all the trials and tribulations of life.
III. The Yoga of English Writers.
The yoga considered merely as a mode or system of meditation is
variously described by European authors, as we shall see below.
Monier Williams says "According to Patanjali—the founder of the system,
the word yoga is interpreted to mean the act of "fixing or concentration
of the mind in abstract meditation. Its aim is to teach the means by
which the human soul may attain complete union with the Supreme Soul,
and of effecting the complete fusion of the individual with the
universal spirit even in the body", Indian Wisdom p. 102.
Weber speaking of the yoga of the Atharvan Upanishads says: "It is the
absorption in átman, the stages of this absorption and the external
means of attaining it." Again says he: "The yoga in the sense of union
with the Supreme Being, is absorption therein by means of meditation. It
occurs first in the latter Upanishads, especially the tenth book of the
Taittiríya and the Katha Upanishads, where the very doctrine is itself
enunciated", Hist. Ind Lit p. 153-171.
Mullins in his prize essay on Vedanta says, the Sankhya yoga is the
union of the body and mind, p. 183. In its Vedantic view, it is the
joining of the individual with the Supreme Spirit by holy communion of
the one with the other through intermediate grades, whereby the limited
soul may be led to approach its unlimited fountain and lose itself in
the same.
IV. Yoga-Characteristic of the Hindus.
Max Müller characterises the Hindu as naturally disposed to Yoga or a
contemplative turn of his mind for his final beatitude in the next life,
amidst all his cares, concerns and callings in this world, which he
looks upon with indifference as the transient shadows of passing clouds,
that serve but to dim for a moment but never shut out from his view the
full blaze of his luminous futurity. This description is so exactly
graphic of the Hindu mind, that we can not with-hold giving it entire as
a mirror of the Hindu mind to our readers on account of the scarcity of
the work in this country.
"The Hindu" says he "enters the world as a stranger; all his thoughts
are directed to another world, he takes no part even where he is driven
to act, and even when he sacrifices his life, it is but to be delivered
from it." Again "They shut their eyes to this world of outward seeming
activity, to open them full on the world of thought and rest. Their life
was a yearning for eternity; their activity was a struggle to return to
that divine essence from which this life seemed to have severed them.
Believing as they did in a really existing and eternal Being to
ontos-onton they could not believe in the existence of this passing
world."
"If the one existed, the other could only seem to exist; if they lived
in the one they could not live in the other. Their existence on earth
was to them a problem, their eternal life a certainty. The highest
object of their religion was to restore that bond by which their own
self (átman) was linked to the eternal self (paramátman); to recover
that unity which had been clouded and obscured by the magical illusions
of reality, by the so-called Máyá of creation."
"It scarcely entered their mind to doubt or to affirm the immortality of
the soul (pretya-bháva). Not only their religion and literature, but
their very language reminded them daily of that relation between the
real and seeming world." (Hist A. S. Lit. p. 18). In the view of Max
Müller as quoted above, the Hindu mind would seem to be of that
realistic cast as the Platonic, whose theory of Ontology viewed all
existence as mere phantoms and percepta of sense, and very short of
that perfection, which the mind realizes in its meditation or Yoga
reveries.
The Hindu Yogi views the visible world exactly in the same light as we
have said before, that Plato has represented it in the simile commencing
the seventh book of his Republic. "He compares mankind to prisoners in a
cave, chained in one particular attitude, so as to behold only an
ever-varying multiplicity of shadows, projected through the opening of
the cave upon the wall before them, by some unseen realities behind. The
philosopher alone, who by training or inspiration, is enabled to turn
his face from these visions, and contemplate with his mind, that can at
once see the unchangeable reality amidst these transient shadows", Baine
on Realism pp. 6 and 7.
V. Various Significations of Yoga.
The Váchaspati lexicon gives us about fifty different meanings of the
word Yoga, according to the several branches of art or science to
which it appertains, and the multifarious affairs of life in which the
word is used either singly or in composition with others. We shall give
some of them below, in order to prevent our mistaking any one of these
senses for the special signification which the term is made to bear in
our system of Yoga meditation.
The word Yoga from the root "jung" (Lat) Jungere means the joining
of any two things or numbers together. Amara Kosha gives five different
meanings of it as,  ; the other Koshas give five others,
viz.,  

1. In Arithmetic it is [**] or addition, and [**] is addition and
subtraction. 2. In Astronomy the conjunction of planets and stars [**]
3. In Grammar it is the joining of letters and words [**]—4. In Nyáya
it means the power of the parts taken together [**], [**] 5. In
Mímánsa it is defined to be the force conveyed by the united members of
a sentence.
In contemplative philosophy it means; 1. According to Pátanjali,—the
suppression of mental functions [**]—2. The Buddhists mean by it—the
abstraction of the mind from all objects. [**] 3. The Vedanta meaning
of it is— [**] the union of the human soul with the Supreme spirit. 4.
Its meaning in the Yoga system is nearly the same, i. e., the
joining of the vital spirit with the soul; [**] 5. Every process of
meditation is called also as Yoga. [**]
Others again use it in senses adapted to their own views and subjects;
such as the Vaiseshika philosophy uses it to mean, the fixing of the
attention to only one subject by abstracting it from all others [**]
2. The Rámánuja sect define it as the seeking of one's particular Deity
[**]
In this sense all sectarian cults are accounted as so many kinds of
Yogas by their respective votaries. 3. According to some Buddhists it is
the seeking of one's object of desire [**]-* [**] 4. And with others,
it is a search after every desirable object. 5. In Rhetoric it means the
union of lovers [**]
In Medicine it means the compounding of drugs under which head there are
many works that are at first sight mistaken for Yoga philosophy. Again
there are many compound words with Yoga which mean only "a treatise"
on those subjects, such as, works on wisdom, on Acts, on Faith &c., are
called [**], [**], [**]
Moreover the words Yoga and Viyoga are used to express the two
processes of synthesis and analysis both in the abstract and practical
sciences for the combination and disjoining of ideas and things.
VI. The Different Stages of Yoga.
The constituent parts and progressive steps of Yoga, are composed of a
series of bodily, mental and spiritual practices, the proper exercise of
which conduces to the making of a perfect man, as a moral, intellectual
and spiritual being, to be united to his Maker in the present and future
worlds. These are called the eight stages of Yoga ( [**]), of which
some are external ( [**]) and others internal ( [**]). The external
ones are:
1st. Yama ( [**]); Forbearance or restraint of passions, feelings
&c., including the best moral rules in all religions.
2nd. Niyama ( [**]); Particular rules and vows for the observance
of the Yogi.
3rd. Asana ( [**]); sedate position of the body to help deep
meditation.
4th. Pránáyáma ( [**]); Suppression and suspension of breath.
5th. Pratyáhára ( [**]), Restraint or control of senses and organs.
Among the internal practices are reckoned the following; viz.;
6th. Dhyána ( [**]); Inward contemplation and meditation.
7th. Dháraná ( [**]); Steadiness of the mind in study.
8th. Samádhi ( [**]), Trance, the last stage of Yoga.
These again comprise some other acts under each of them, such as:
I. Yama ( [**]) Restraint includes five acts under it;
1st. Ahimsá ( [**]); Universal innocence or hurting no animal
creature.
2nd. Asteyam ( [**]); Avoidance of theft or stealth.
3rd. Satyam ( [**]); Observance of truth.
4th. Brahmacharyam ( [**]); consisting in purity and chastity.
5th. Aparigraha ( [**]); Disinterestedness.
II. Niyama ( [**]); Moral rules consisting of five-fold acts. Viz.:
1st. Saucham ( [**]); Personal cleanliness.
2nd. Santosha ( [**]); contentment.
3rd. Tapas ( [**]); Devotion including self denial and self
mortification.
4th. Sádhyáya ( [**]); knowledge of all nature.
5th. Pranidhána ( [**]); Adoration of God.
III. Asana ( [**]); Different modes of postures, tranquil posture
( [**]) &c.
IV. Pránáyáma ( [**]); Rules of Respiration, three sorts, viz.:
1st. Rechaka ( [**]); Expiration or Exhalation.
2nd. Púraka ( [**]); Inspiration or Inhalation.
3rd. Kumbhaka ( [**]); Suppression of breathing, eight ways.
V. Pratyáhára ( [**]) Restraining the senses from their
gratifications in many ways.
VI. Dhyána ( [**]); Abstract contemplation, apart from the
testimonies of:—
1. Pratyaxa ( [**]); Perceptions.
2. Pramána ( [**]); Apprehensions.
3. Anumána ( [**]); Inference.
4. Sabda ( [**]); Verbal testimony.
VII. Dháraná ( [**]); Retentiveness.
VIII. Samádhi ( [**]); Absorption in meditation, in two ways;
1. Savikalpa ( [**]); With retention of self volition.
2. Nirvikalpa ( [**]); With loss of volition.
The Upáyas ( [**]); Or the means spoken of before are:
1. Uposhana ( [**]); Abstinence.
2. Mitásana ( [**]); Temperance.
3. Ásrama ( [**]); Sheltered abodes.
4. Visráma ( [**]) Rest and repose from labor.
5. Avarodha ( [**]); Self confinement in closets.
6. Asanam ( [**]); Subsistence on light food.
Beside these there are many vices called Apáyas or dóshas ( [**])
which are obstacles to meditation, and which we omit on account of their
prolixity.
VII. Nature of the Soul.
Now as the end and aim of Yoga is the emancipation of the Soul, it is
necessary to give some account of the nature of the soul (átmatatwa)
as far as it was known to the sages of India, and formed the primary
subject of inquiry with the wise men of every country according to the
sayings: "Gnothe seauton," =
"Nosce teipsum," "Know thyself," "Khodra bedan," and Arabic
"Taalam Nafsaka," [**] &c.
"The word Atman," says Max Müller, "which in the Veda occurs as often as
"twan," meant life, particularly animal life (Vide Rig Veda I. 63, 8).
Atmá in the sense of self occurs also in the Rig Veda (I. 162. 20),
in the passage [**] [**]. It is also found to be used in the higher
sense of soul in the verse [**] "The sun is the soul of all that moves
and rests (R. VI. 115. 1). The highest soul is called paramátman
( [**]) of which all other souls partake, from which all reality in
this created world emanates, and into which every thing will return."
Atman originally meant air as the Greek atmos, Gothic ahma, Zend
tmánam, Sanscrit [**] and [**], Cuniform adam, Persian dam,
whence we derive Sans [**] Hindi [**] Uria and Prakrit [**] and
Bengali [**], [**] &c. The Greek and Latin ego and German ich
are all derived from the same source. The Romance je and Hindi ji
are corruptions of Sanskrit [**] meaning life and spirit. Again the
Páli [**] and the Prakrit [**] is from the Sanscrit [**], which is
[**] in Hindi, [**] in Bengali and [**] in Uria &c. The Persian
"man" is evidently the Sátman by elision of the initial syllable.
These meanings of átman = the self and ego form the basis of the
knowledge of the Divine soul both of the Hindu as of any other people,
who from the consciousness of their own selves rise to that of the
Supreme. Thus says Max Müller on the subject, "A Hindu speaking of
himself [**] spoke also, though unconsciously of the soul of the
universe [**], and to know himself, was to him to know both his own
self and the Universal soul, or to know himself in the Divine self."
We give below the different lights in which the Divine soul was viewed
by the different schools of Hindu philosophy, and adopted accordingly in
their respective modes of Yoga meditation. The Upanishads called it
Brahma of eternal and infinite wisdom [**]
The Vedantists;—A Being full of intelligence and blissfulness [**]
The Sánkaras;—A continued consciousness of one self. [**] [**] The
doctrine of Descartes and Malebranche.
The Materialists—convert the soul to all material forms [**]
The Lokáyatas—take the body with intelligence to be the soul; [**]
The Chárvákas—call the organs and sensations as soul; [**]
Do. Another sect—take the cognitive faculties as such; [**]
Do. Others—Understand the mind as soul [**]
Do. Others—call the vital breath as soul [**]
Do. Others—understand the son as soul [**]
The Digambaras—say, the complete human body is the soul [**]
The Mádhyamikas—take the vacuum for their soul [**]-* [**]
The Yogácháris—understand the soul to be a transient flash of knowledge
in the spirit in meditation. [**]
The Sautrántas—call it a short inferior knowledge. [**]-* [**]
The Vaibháshikas—take it to be a momentary perception [**] [**]
The Jainas—take their preceptor to be their soul [**] [**]
The Logicians—A bodiless active and passive agency [**]-* [**]
The Naiyáyikas—understand the spirit to be self manifest [**]
The Sánkhyas,—call the spirit to be passive, not active [**] [**** ]
The Yogis—call Him a separate omnipotent Being [**]-* [**]
The Saivas,—designate the spirit as knowledge itself [**] [**]
The Mayávádis,—style Brahma as the soul [**]-* [**]
The Vaiseshikas,—acknowledge two souls—the Vital and Supreme [**]
The Nyayá says—because the soul is immortal there is a future state

And thus there are many other theories about the nature of the soul.
The Atmávádis—spiritualists, consider the existence of the body as
unnecessary to the existence of the soul.
VIII. Final Emancipation or Beatitude.
The object of Yoga, as already said, being the emancipation of the
soul from the miseries of the world, and its attainment to a state of
highest felicity, it is to be seen what this state of felicity is, which
it is the concern of every man to know, and which the Yogi takes so
much pains to acquire. The Vedantic Yogi, as it is well known, aims at
nothing less than in his absorption in the Supreme Spirit and loosing
himself in infinite bliss. But it is not so with others, who are averse
to loose the sense of their personal identity, and look forward to a
state of self existence either in this life or next, in which they shall
be perfectly happy. The Yogis of India have various states of this bliss
which they aim at according to the faith to which they belong, as we
shall show below.
The Vedantic Yogi has two states of bliss in view; viz., the one
inferior which is attained in this life by means of knowledge [**],
and the other superior, obtainable after many births of gradual
advancement to perfection [**]
The Chárvákas say, that it is either independence or death that is
bliss. [**]
The Mádhyamikas say, it is extinction of self that is called liberation
[**]
The Vijnáni philosophers—have it to be clear and elevated understanding
[**]
The Arhatas have it in deliverance from all veil and covering [**]
The Máyávádis say, that it is removal of the error of one's separate
existence as a particle of the Supreme spirit [**]-* [**]
The Rámánujas called it to be the knowledge of Vásudeva as cause of all,
[**]
The Mádhyamikas have it for the perfect bliss enjoyed by Vishnu [**]
The Ballabhis expect it in sporting with Krishna in heaven [**]
The Pásupatas and Máheswaras place it in the possession of all dignity
[**]
The Kápálikas place it in the fond embraces of Hara and Durga [**]
The Pratyabhijnánis call it to be the perfection of the soul. [**]
The Raseswara Vádis have it in the health of body produced by mercury
[**]
The Vaisesikas seek it in the extinction of all kinds of pain [**]
The Mimánsakas view their happiness in heavenly bliss [**] [**]
The Sarvajnas say that, it is the continued feeling of highest felicity
[**]
The Pánini philologers find it in the powers of speech [**] [**]
The Sánkhyas find it in the union of force with matter [**] [**]
The Udásína Atheists have it as consisting in the ignoring of self
identity [**]
The Pátanjalas view it in the unconnected unity of the soul [**]
The Persian Sufis call it ázádigi or unattachment of the soul to any
worldly object.
IX. Origin of Yoga in the Vedas.
Not in the Vedic Period.
The origin of yoga meditation is placed at a period comparatively less
ancient than the earliest Sanhita or hymnic period of vedic history,
when the Rishis followed the elementary worship of the physical forces,
or the Brahmanic age when they were employed in the ceremonial
observances.
Some Traces of it.
There are however some traces of abstract contemplation "dhyána yoga" to
be occasionally met with in the early Vedas, where the Rishis are
mentioned to have indulged themselves in such reveries. Thus in the Rig
Veda—129. 4. [**] [**]
"The poets discovered in their heart, through meditation, the bond of
the existing in the non-existing." M. Müller. A. S. Lit. (p. 19.)
The Gáyatrí Meditation .
We have it explicitly mentioned in the Gáyatrí hymn of the Rig Veda,
which is daily recited by every Brahman, and wherein its author
Viswámitra "meditated on the glory of the Lord for the illumination of
his understanding" [**]. But this bespeaks a development of
intellectual meditation "jnana yoga" only, and not spiritual as there
is no prayer for ( [**]) liberation.
Áranyaka Period.
It was in the third or Áranyaka period, that the yoga came in vogue with
the second class of the Atharva Upanishads, presenting certain phases in
its successive stages, as we find in the following analysis of them
given by Professor Weber in his History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature.
This class of works, he says, is chiefly made up of subjects relating to
yoga, as consisting in divine meditation and giving up all earthly
connections. (Ibid p. 163).
Yoga Upanishads.
To this class belong the Jábála, Katha—sruti, Bhallavi, Samvartasruti,
Sannyása, Hansa and Paramhansa Upanishads, Srimaddatta, the Mándukya and
Tarkopanishads, and a few others, (Ibid. p. 164). It will exceed our
bounds to give an account of the mode of yoga treated in these
treatises, which however may be easily gathered by the reader from a
reference to the Fifty two Upanishads lately published in this city.
Their different modes of yoga.
Beside the above, we find mention of yoga and the various modes of
conducting it in some other Upanishads, as given below by the same
author and analyst. The Kathopanishad or Kathavallí of the Atharva Veda,
treats of the first principles of Deistic Yoga. Ibid. p. 158.
The Garbhopanishad speaks of the Sánkhya and Pátanjali yoga systems as
the means of knowing Náráyana. (Ibid. p. 160). The Brahmopanishad, says
Weber, belongs more properly to the yoga Upanishads spoken of before.
(Ibid. p. 161).
The Nirálambopanishad exhibits essentially the yoga standpoint according
to Dr. Rajendra Lala Mitra (Notices of S. Mss. II 95. Weber's Id. p.
162). The yoga tatwa and yoga sikhá belong to yoga also, and depict the
majesty of Átmá. (Ibid. p. 165).
Among the Sectarian Upanishads will be found the Náráyanopanishad, which
is of special significance in relation to the Sánkhya and Yoga doctrines
(Ibid. p. 166).
Sánkhya and Pátanjala Yogas.
It is plain from the recurrence of the word Sánkhya in the later
Upanishads of the Taittiríya and Atharva vedas and in the Nirukta and
Bhagavad Gítá, that the Sánkhya Yoga was long known to the ancients, and
the Pátanjala was a further development of it. (Ibid. p. 137).
Yoga Yájnavalkya.
Along with or prior to Pátanjali comes the Yoga Sástra of Yogi
Yájnavalkya, the leading authority of the Sátapatha Bráhmana, who is
also regarded as a main originator of the yoga doctrine in his later
writings. (Ibid. p. 237). Yájnavalkya speaks of his obtaining the Yoga
Sástra from the sun, [**] [**]
"He who wishes to attain yoga must know the Áranyaka which I have
received from the sun, and the Yoga sástra which I have taught."
X. Rise of the Heretical Yogas.
The Buddhist and Jain Yogas.
Beside the Orthodox yoga systems of the Upanishads, we have the
Heterodox Yoga Sastras of the Buddhists and Jains completely concordant
with those of Yájnavalkya in the Brihad áranyaka and Atharvan
Upanishads, (Weber's Id. p. 285).
The concordance with the Vedantic.
The points of coincidence of the vedánta yoga with those of Buddhism and
Jainism, consist in as much as both of them inculcate the doctrine of
the interminable metempsychosis of the human soul, as a consequence of
bodily acts, previous to its state of final absorption or utter
annihilation, according to the difference in their respective views. Or
to explain it more clearly they say that, "The state of humanity in its
present, past and future lives, is the necessary result of its own acts
"Karma" in previous births."
The weal or woe of mankind.
That misery or happiness in this life is the unavoidable sequence of
conduct in former states of existence, and that our present actions will
determine our states to come; that is, their weal or woe depending
solely on the merit or demerit of acts. It is, therefore, one's
cessation from action by confining himself to holy meditation, that
secures to him his final absorption in the supreme according to the one;
and by his nescience of himself that ensures his utter extinction
according to the other.






Om Tat Sat
                                                        
(Continued...) 




( My humble salutations to Brahmasri Sreemaan Vihari Lala Mitra ji for the collection)

The Yoga Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki ( Introduction) -1

0 comments




























The
Yoga Vasishtha
Maharamayana
of Valmiki

The only complete English translation is
by Vihari Lala  Mitra (1891).





[Yoga Vasishtha Maharamayana is a large, remarkable classical Indian text of philosophy, illustrated

by similes, parables, allegories and stories. The only complete English translation is by V.L. Mitra
(1891).
Recommended download in Word or PDF (Word preferrable).
It is currently being prepared for publication in the public domain at the Project
Gutenberg/Distributed Proofreaders (www.pgdp.net).
This file contains the introductory chapters (Preface and "Prolegomena").
The brackets with two stars: [**] denote that Devanagari Sanskrit text is to be inserted here later on.
The rest of Yoga Vasishtha has been uploaded at Scribd separately.
There is a group (and a collection) dedicated to this work named "Yoga Vasishtha, Mitra translation"


The
Yoga Vasishtha
Maharamayana
of
Valmiki
  

Vol. 1
Containing
The Vairagya, Mumukshu, Prakaranas and
The Utpatti Khanda to Chapter L.


Translated from the original Sanskrit
By
VIHARI-LALA MITRA


PREFACE.
In this age of the cultivation of universal learning and its
investigation into the deep recesses of the dead languages of antiquity,
when the literati of both continents are so sedulously employed in
exploring the rich and almost inexhaustible mines of the ancient
literature of this country, it has given an impetus to the philanthropy
of our wise and benign Government to the institution of a searching
enquiry into the sacred language of this land. And when the restoration
of the long lost works of its venerable sages and authors through the
instrumentality of the greatest bibliomaniac savants and linguists in
the several Presidencies,* has led the literary Asiatic Societies of
the East and West to the publication of the rarest and most valuable
Sanskrit Manuscripts, it cannot be deemed preposterous in me to presume,
to lay before the Public a work of no less merit and sanctity than any
hitherto published.
* Dr. Rajendra Lala Mitra in Bengal, Benares and Orissa; Dr.
Buhler in Guzrat; Dr. Keilhorn in the Central Provinces; Dr. Burnell and
other Collectors of Sanskrit manuscripts in the Presidencies of Bombay,
Madras and Oudh, whose notices and catalogues have highly contributed to
bring the hidden treasures of the literature of this country to light.
The Yoga Vasishtha is the earliest work on Yoga or Speculative and
Abstruse philosophy delivered by the venerable Vedic sage Vasishtha to
his royal pupil Ráma; the victor of Rávana, and hero of the
first Epic Rámáyana, and written in the language of Válmiki, the prime
bard in pure Sanskrit, the author of that popular Epic, and Homer of
India. It embodies in itself the Loci Communes or common places
relating to the science of Ontology, the knowledge of Sat—Real
Entity, and Asat—Unreal Non-entity; the principles of Psychology or
doctrines of the Passions and Feelings; the speculations of Metaphysics
in dwelling upon our cognition, volition and other faculties of the Mind
( [**]) and the tenets, of Ethics and practical morality ( [**]).
Besides there are a great many precepts on Theology, and the nature of
the Divinity ( [**]), and discourses on Spirituality and Theosophy
( [**]); all delivered in the form of Plato's Dialogues between the
sages, and tending to the main enquiry concerning the true felicity,
final beatitude or Summum bonum ( [**]) of all true philosophy.
These topics have singly and jointly contributed to the structure of
several separate Systems of Science and Philosophy in succeeding ages,
and have formed the subjects of study both with the juvenile and senile
classes of people in former and present times, and I may say, almost
among all nations in all countries throughout the civilized world.
It is felt at present to be a matter of the highest importance by the
native community at large, to repress the growing ardour of our youth in
political polemics and practical tactics, that are equally pernicious to
and destructive of the felicity of their temporal and future lives, by
a revival of the humble instructions of their peaceful preceptors of
old, and reclaiming them to the simple mode of life led by their
forefathers, from the perverted course now gaining ground among them
under the influence of Western refinement. Outward peace ( [**]) with
internal tranquility ( [**]) is the teaching of our Sastras, and these
united with contentment ( [**]) and indifference to worldly pleasures
( [**]), were believed according to the tenets of Yoga doctrines, to
form the perfect man,—a character which the Aryans have invariably
preserved amidst the revolutions of ages and empires. It is the
degeneracy of the rising generation, however, owing to their adoption of
foreign habits and manners from an utter ignorance of their own moral
code, which the publication of the present work is intended to obviate.
From the description of the Hindu mind given by Max Müller in his
History of the Ancient Literature of India (p. 18) it will appear, that
the esoteric faith of the Aryan Indian is of that realistic cast as the
Platonic, whose theory of ontology viewed all existence, even that of
the celestial bodies, with their movements among the precepta of
sense, and marked them among the unreal phantoms ( [**]) or vain
mirage, ( [**]) as the Hindu calls them, that are interesting in
appearance but useless to observe. They may be the best of all
precepta, but fall very short of that perfection, which the mental eye
contemplates in its meditation-yoga. The Hindu Yogi views the visible
world exactly in the same light as Plato has represented it in the
simile commencing the seventh book of his Republic. He compares mankind
to prisoners in a cave, chained in one particular attitude, so as to
behold only an evervarying multiplicity of shadows, projected through
the opening of the cave upon the wall before them, by certain unseen
realities behind. The philosopher alone, who by training or inspiration
is enabled to turn his face from these visions, and contemplate with his
mind, that can see at-once the unchangeable reality amidst these
transient shadows.
The first record that we have of Vasishtha is, that he was the author of
the 7th Mandala of the Rig Veda (Ashtaka v. 15-118). He is next
mentioned as Purohita or joint minister with Viswámitra to king
Sudása, and to have a violent contest with his rival for the ( [**]) or
ministerial office (Müll. Hist. S. Lit. page 486, Web. Id. p. 38). He is
said to have accompanied the army of Sudása, when that king is said to
have conquered the ten invading chiefs who had crossed over the river
Parushni—(Hydroates or Ravi) to his dominions (Müll. Id. p. 486).
Viswámitra accompanied Sudása himself beyond Vipása,—Hyphasis or Beah
and Satadru—Hisaudras-Sutlej (Max Müller, Ancient Sanscrit literature
page 486). These events are recorded to have occurred prior to
Vasishtha's composition of the Mandala which passes under his name and
in which they are recorded. (Müll. Id. p. 486).
The enmity and implacable hatred of the two families of Vasishthas and
Viswámitras for generations, form subjects prominent throughout the
Vedic antiquity, and preserved in the tradition of ages (Mull. Id. p.
486, Web. Id. p. 37). Another cause of it was that, Harischandra, King
of Ayodhyá, was cursed by Vasishtha, whereupon he made Viswámitra his
priest to the annoyance of Vasishtha, although the office of Bráhmana
was held by him (Müller Id. page 408 Web. pp. 31-37). In the Bráhmana
period we find Vasishtha forming a family title for the whole Vasishtha
race still continuing as a Gotra name, and that these Vasishthas
continued as hereditary Gurus and purohitas to the kings of the
solar race from generation to generation under the same title. The
Vasishthas were always the Brahmanas or High priests in every ceremony,
which could not be held by other Bráhmanas according to the Sáta patha
Bráhmana (Müll. Id. page 92); and particularly the Indra ceremony had
always to be performed by a Vasishtha, because it was revealed to their
ancestor the sage Vasishtha only (Web. Ind. Lit. p. 123); and as the
Sátapatha Bráhmana-Taittiriya Sanhitá mentions it.



"The Rishis do not see Indra clearly, but Vasishtha saw him. Indra said,
I will tell you, O Bráhman, so that all men who are born, will have a
Vasishtha for his Purohita" (Max Müll. Ans. Sans. Lit. p. 92. Web. Id.
p. 123). This will show that the Sloka works, which are attributed to
Vasishtha, Yájnavalkya or any other Vedic Rishi, could not be the
composition of the old Rishis, but of some one of their posterity;
though they might have been propounded by the eldest sages, and then
put to writing by oral communication or successive tradition by a
distant descendant or disciple of the primitive Rishis. Thus we see the
Dráhyáyana Sutras of the Sama Veda is also called the Vasishtha
Sutras, from the author's family name of Vasishtha (Web. Id. p. 79). The
ásvaláyana Grihya Sutra assigns some other works to Vasishtha, viz.,
the Vasishtha pragáthá, probably Vasishtha Hymni of Bopp; the
Pavamánya, Kshudra sukta, Mahásukta &c. written in the vedic
style. There are two other works attributed to Vasishtha, the Vasishtha
Sanhitá on Astronomy (Web. Id. p. 258) and the Vasishtha Smriti on Law
(Web. Id. p. 320), which from their compositions in Sanscrit slokas,
could not be the language or work of the Vedic Rishi, but of some one
late member of that family. Thus our work of Yoga Vasishtha has no claim
or pretension to its being the composition of the Vedic sage; but as one
propounded by the sage, and written by Válmiki in his modern Sanskrit.
Here the question is whether Vasishtha the preceptor of Ráma, was the
Vedic Vasishtha or one of his descendants, I must leave for others to
determine.


Again in the later Áranyaka period we have an account of a theologian
Vasishtha given in the Árshik-opanishad, as holding a dialogue on the
nature of átmá or soul between the sages, Viswámitra, Jamadagni,
Bharadwája, Gautama and himself; when Vasishtha appealing to the opinion
of Kapila obtained their assent (Weber Id. p. 162). This appears very
probably to be the theological author of our yoga, and eminent above his
contemporaries in his knowledge of the Kapila yoga sástra which was
then current, from this sage's having been a contemporary with king
Sagara, a predecessor of Rama.
In the latest Sútra period we find a passage in the
Grihya-Sútra-parisishta, about the distinctive mark of the Vasishtha
Family from those of the other parishads or classes of the priesthood.
It says,


"The Vasishthas wear a braid (lock of hair) on the right side, the
Átreyas wear three braids, the Angiras have five braids, the Bhrigus are
bald, and all others have a single crest," (Müller Id. p. 53). The Karma
pradípa says, "the Vasishthas exclude meat from their sacrifice; [**]
(Müller A. S. Lit. p. 54), and the colour of their dress was white (Id.
p. 483). Many Vasishthas are named in different works as; [**] [**]
[**], and some others, bearing no other connection with our author,
than that of their having been members of the same family (Müller's A.
S. Lit. p. 44).
Without dilating any longer with further accounts relating to the sage
Vasishtha of which many more might be gathered from various sastras, I
shall add in the conclusion the following notice which is taken of this
work by Professor Monier Williams in his work on Indian Wisdom p. 370.
"There is", says he, "a remarkable work called Vasishtha Rámáyana or
Yoga Vásishtha or Vasishtha Mahárámáyana in the form of an exhortation,
with illustrative narratives addressed by Vasishtha to his pupil the
youthful Ráma, on the best means of attaining true happiness, and
considered to have been composed as an appendage to the Rámáyana by
Válmiki himself. There is another work of the same nature called the
Adhyátma Rámáyana which is attributed to Vyása, and treat of the moral
and theological subjects connected with the life and acts of that great
hero of Indian history. Many other works are extant in the vernacular
dialects having the same theme for their subject which it is needless to
notice in this place."
Vasishtha, known as the wisest of sages, like Solomon the wisest of men,
and Aurelius the wisest of emperors, puts forth in the first part and in
the mouth of Ráma the great question of the vanity of the world, which
is shown synthetically to a great length from the state of all living
existences, the instinct, inclinations, and passions of men, the nature
of their aims and objects, with some discussions about destiny,
necessity, activity and the state of the soul and spirit. The second
part embraces various directions for the union of the individual with
the universal Abstract Existence—the Supreme Spirit—the subjective and
the objective truth—and the common topics of all speculative
philosophy.

Thus says Milton: "The end of learning is to know God".
So the Persian adage, "Akhiral ilm buad ilmi Khodá."
Such also the Sanskrit, "Sávidyá tan matir yayá."
And the sruti says, "Yad jnátwá náparan jnánam."
i. e. "It is that which being known, there is nothing else required to
be known."

1. The Yoga Philosophy 1
2. The Om Tat Sat 34
 





Om Tat Sat
                                                        
(Continued...) 




( My humble salutations to Brahmasri Sreemaan Vihari Lala Mitra ji for the collection)

Adhyatma Ramayana - Fifth Adhyaya (an Article)

0 comments











Adhyatma Ramayana (AR)


(Fifth Adhyaya)

The fifth adhyaya of the uttara kanda of AR is a conversation between Lord Rama and his brother, Lakshmana. This is usually called the Rama GITA. It is purely advaitic and very interesting to read.

Some of the examples given by Lord Rama in AR are very nice.

1. A frog is being swallowed by a snake. Even though it knows that it is going to be dead in a few moments, the frog puts out its tongue in the hope it will catch some insects. Similarly, man is being swallowed by the serpent of Time, but he is still running after transitory sense pleasures instead of remembering Me.

2. A dog bites a dry bone thinking that there is some meat there. It goes on biting the bone that blood starts to flow from its mouth. The stupid dog, however, thinks that the blood is from the meat of the bone and bites more and more at it. Similarly, man foolishly thinks that happiness lies in external objects and hankers after that. This results in wastage of the body and mind. Instead, if he leaves the bone alone, he will find happiness within.

Both the above examples used to be quoted by Kanchi periyava in His speeches to show that man is foolish for sense-pleasures even when he knows that death is always round the corner. Similar sentiments are expressed beautifully by Shankara in bhaja govindam.

dinayaaminyau saayaM praataH
shishiravasantau punaraayaataH .
kaalaH kriiDati gachchhatyaayuH
tadapi na muJNchatyaashaavaayuH .. 12..

Daylight and darkness, dusk and dawn, winter and springtime come and go. Time plays and life ebbs away. But the storm of desire never leaves.


aN^gaM galitaM palitaM muNDaM
dashanavihiinaM jataM tuNDam.h .
vR^iddho yaati gR^ihiitvaa daNDaM
tadapi na muJNchatyaashaapiNDam.h .. 15..

Strength has left the old man's body; his head has become bald, his gums toothless and leaning on crutches. Even then the attachment is strong and he clings firmly to fruitless desires.

So, what should one do ? Again, Shankara,in His infinite mercy, comes to our rescue and advises:

mUDha jahiihi dhanaagamatR^ishhNaaM
kuru sadbuddhiM manasi vitR^ishhNaam.h .
yallabhase nijakarmopaattaM
vittaM tena vinodaya chittam.h .. 2..

Oh fool ! Give up your thrist to amass wealth, devote your mind to thoughts to the Real. Be content with what comes through actions already performed in the past.

Actions performed in the past have resulted in the present prarabdha karma. That has to work its way out, when we like it or not. The purpose for which the body was created has to be fulfilled, whether the mind likes to perform its duty or not. Therefore, Shankara asks us to be content, make our mind equanimous and concentrate on the real. Because instead of ruminating about samsara, if we devote thoughts to the real, we will ascertain the Truth. Where is the world/samsara when the Truth is known ? (GYaate tattve kaH saMsaaraH .. Shankara)

There is also a very nice exposition of bhakti in advaita by Lord Rama in AR. He talks to Hanuman-ji on how bhakti results in jnana ultimately. The steps indicated by Him are very similar to the nine steps (shravana, manana, pada6sevana,sharangati etc.) found in the bhagavatam. There are some beautiful hymns on what bhakti is and what one should ask God with Bhakti. These are from the works of Shankara, Tulasidas' Ramayana (called Ramacharitamanas) and AR. I will post them in an article later.

AUM shaantiH










Om Tat Sat
                                                        
(Continued...)

(My humble salutations Sreeman Brahmasri Ananda Hudli,  great Devotees , Philosophic Scholars, Advaita Vedanta dot org       for the collection)